Wednesday, December 5, 2012

How far can a 900 MHz monitor get?

Q. I'm talking about baby monitor. Is it the same as a cordless phone range? Is it better than 49 MHz (as it's much higher frequency)?
Thanks for the answers. So you both says it doesn't matter on the difference as long as it's used in a house.

I was confused as some retailer shows the frequency but not the distance. While another shows the distance but no frequency (e.g. 49 MHz or 900 MHz. And another shows 120 m or 400')

Could anybody suggest which one is better to choose from? (based on the frequency or the distance)

A. Higher frequencies are more easily blocked, so lower frequency ones will probably have a better range. Both should work inside your house.
It depends more on the power output than on the frequency.

There may be less interference and noise with the 900Mhz one


Where can I find a baby monitor that won't interfere with wireless routers?
Q. My boyfriend's appartment building if full of wireless routers, and thats where we plan to raise our baby for a while. But we need a baby monitor that won't be affected by all the wireless routers. But everywhere I look it seems that every baby monitor that I seem interested in will be affected by a wireless router. I've already looked at Wal-Mart, Babies R' 'Us, Ebay, and Best Buy seems to not even carry baby monitors. Where Can I find a baby monitor that won't be affected by wireless routers?

A. Look for one that operates in the 900 Mhz or the 5.4 GHz frequency range.

Anything that is not 2.4 GHz should work.


If you need 2 baby monitors, do they need to be the same brand?
Q. I have a son who will be 2 yrs 9 mos when my second is born in October. We generally stay pretty close to his room but he is on the second floor and we have a finished basement with a tv, so I feel like we still need a monitor for his room when we are on other floors. We have a fisher price sound and light monitor we got handed down from my brother in law which besides ocassional static works really well. of course its got to be almost 7 years old and I can't get one like it. I saw a good deal on a basic graco one that was highly rated. Would the 2 interfere or do you have to use the same brand?
On a related note, when did you stop using a monitor for older kids? My husband suggested we wouldn't need one but my son cannot open the bedroom door, we shut it at night because we don't want our cats in there, plus we have a lot of steps in our house, so i'd rather be able to hear him because its harder for him to come to us. I know people with school aged kids who still use one.
OK, since the first answerer clearly didn't read this-my son is 2 years 3 months so he doens't use the toilet, if he did he could call us and we'd come get him-thats why we have a monitor! we shut the door because we have cats and they would come in his room and wake him at night if we didn't-also our house is not so small we can hear him everywhere and he is still learning to navigate steps. Sheesh.

A. No they don't ... however, if they are both analog you they may encounter interference from each other.


1. Use one analog and one digital

2. Use an analog one of a different frequency --- ie: if you have a 900 MHz monitor, buy a 49 MHz one and vice versa.

3. You can also purchase one of the same frequency (esp 900 MHz because these have MANY channels) and see if you encounter interference --- most likely you will not. But it is possible.


I'm not sure what the two monitor's frequencies are --- so you will have to investigate. My suggestion is to buy a digital one as your second one. I have this digital one (reasonable price) and have always been happy with it.

http://www.diapers.com/Product/ProductDetail.aspx?productId=6619


Anyone have any Phone frequiencies for programmable Scanners ??
Q.

A. it is illeagal to listen to or record a telephone conversation that you are not part of...

with that said.. there are 25 channels for the 1st gen cordless phones, but not many people use them any longer, they are around 40-50 mhz....

900 mhz phones operate around 900 to aprox 925 mhz... there are many brands, with variations to the channeling of the phones.... so you will have to scan that area...

most "newer" 900 mhz phones have DSS so you will not hear anything but a scrambled digital signal (which you can not unscramble)

2.4ghz, 5.8 ghz phones operate outside the range which most radio scanners operate, but are also digital and encrypted, so even if you could recieve the signal, you wouldnt be able to do anything about it...

your scanner may be able to scan the 1.9ghz range for DECT phones, but again they will be digital, and scrambled...

baby monitors are another thing that you can scan for... people forget they are on sometimes...

most people arent talking about anything intresting on the phone anyhow.. it can be boring to listen to someone elses conversation...

phonelosers.org has a list of intresting scanner frequencies..

EDIT:
cell phones arent able to be picked up.. the old anolouge phones were in the 800 mhz range, but all scanners sold today have the cellular range blocked out..

many people would love to scan the nextel walkie talkies, but they also are unscannable... at least for now...





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Best Value Baby Monitor?

Q. I check out some the best baby monitors recommended by consumer report, but most of them are a little expensive then I expected. Well, I'm hoping for something that is affordable and has crystal clear sound. Any idea?

A. I also vote for Safety 1st:)

At first, I was thinking to get a Phlips DESC baby monitor for my wife, but it's too pricey for me at that time. Anyway, after much research, I don't think you can find any better deal then this Safety First High Def Digital baby monitor for paying less then $80.

It is even better then my previous Graco iMonitor baby monitor(pretty good and cheap too). There are no static sound and the channel is pretty clear even though I have cordless phone and wireless network at home. Hope this help:)


Is it worth it taking Accutane?
Q. I have a next appointment on Tuesday. My dermatologist is going to prescribe me Accutane because I have tried everything out there, but yet I still have cystic acne which are leaving me bad scaring. I was wondering, is it worth it? My boyfriend is really iffy about it, but he will support me with my decision. Appreciate it if past users or current users of Accutane will answer. Thank You.

A. Accutane is a highly controversial drug yet incredibly remains the industry standard for severe acne. Swiss drugmaker Roche Holding AG, manufacturer of Accutane, has spent most of this century in court defending itself against lawsuits from people whose health has been irreparably damaged by this menacing drug.

Roche has lost six out of six lawsuits and was recently ordered to pay $25.16 million in damages to an Accutane user who developed inflammatory bowel disease as a result of the drug. Due to generic competition and the exorbitant cost of defending personal injury lawsuits, Roche stopped selling the drug in June 2009.

However, the generic form of Accutane (isotretinoin) is equally deadly and remains available in the marketplace under the names Claravis, Sotret and Amnesteem. More than two million people have taken Accutane, despite the fact that it is known to cause depression, suicide, inflammatory bowel disease, and 100 percent guarantee of birth defects if taken by a pregnant woman.

In 2004, brain scans showed that people taking Accutane suffer a 21 percent decrease in frontal brain activity, the part of the brain that plays a critical role in mood and social interaction. These brain changes may explain the depression, suicidal and aggressive behavior, and psychotic reactions reported by some Accutane users.

Even official regulation policy acknowledges the real danger of Accutane. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned physicians and consumers about reports of "depression, psychosis, and rarely suicidal thoughts and actions" related to the use of Accutane. Patients using Accutane reported to the FDA that these psychological symptoms improved after stopping Accutane therapy, but worsened with re-start of the drug.

In light of this evidence, the labeling of Accutane was changed to strengthen the warning about its risk for causing depression. Isotretinoin now has the strongest warning available for any drug category�and given a FDA Pregnancy Category X rating..

If you are taking isotretinoin and become pregnant, you are virtually guaranteed to be damaging your baby. Accutane is extremely teratogenic (causing damage to a fetus).

According to the Mayo Clinic: "Isotretinoin is associated with severe birth defects, so it can't be taken by pregnant women or women who may become pregnant during the course of treatment or within several weeks of concluding treatment. In fact, the drug carries such serious potential side effects that women of reproductive age must participate in a Food and Drug Administration-approved monitoring program to receive a prescription for the drug."

In addition to teratogenic and psychological adverse effects, Accutane (isotretinoin) users have reported the following negative effects:

Increased levels of triglycerides and cholesterol in your blood
Headaches and brain swelling
Damage to skin & mucous membrains
Premature epiphyseal closure
Development of inflammatory bowel disease
Pancreatitis
Increased liver enzyme levels and liver damage
Disturbance of your central nervous system
Hyperostosis (excessive bone growth) and demineralizaton
Damage to your eyes including cataracts
Heart attack & stroke
Erectile dysfunction
Siezures
Neutropenia, agranulocytosis, & rhabodomyolysis
Hearing impairment
Allergic vasculitis

If your doctor is prescribing this, he must either be a real HACK or have some other agenda for doing so. It is NOT a last resort. There are many root causes of acne you need to look at that can be very effective. Doctors "Treat symptoms" and do NOT practice real health, only "MAKE BELIEVE HEALTH" by prescribing drugs.

You can get rid of "Cystic acne" with a natural regimen in weeks without drugs. It hits the problem at it's roots, not just "Treating the symptoms" like doctors are trained to do by prescribing drugs.

good luck to you


What baby monitor is best?
Q. We live on a busy highway. Lots of trucks pass by daily and I am concerned about interference from their radios. I don't however want to spend a fortune on a baby monitor. Can anyone suggest a good one that's not too expensive? TIA

A. If you'll go to the Consumer Reports website they have all kinds of articles on the best baby monitors in correlation with price. Good luck!


Does anyone know what the best ovulation test is? Where do you get them from.?
Q. Me and my husband are trying to have a baby. I have one child that is not his so know we are trying to have one of our own. He has no kids at all. So we want something that is very good.

A. Well, you have a few options--
The best (my opinion and that of consumer reports) is the Clearblue line of tests. Their regular ovulation test kit, you get 7 tests for a little under $20. 1 kit usually does you for 1 cycle. They have digitals that cost about $30 for 7 tests but they are much easier to read. Clearblue also has a fertility monitor--about $150, worth it if you think it will take you a while to get pg, but you also still have to buy sticks for it-$45 for 30 sticks.
Check out ebay for some really good deals on ovulation tests. The cheapie ones may work well for you, so you may want to buy a few and try them out.
Also, I've used the anser brand--$11 for 7 tests and they work pretty good too.
The third thing, and I'm sorry if this isn't exactly what you are looking for, get a thermometer and chart your basal body temps (www.fertilityfriend.com)--a thermometer costs about $7 so very cheap!





Powered by Yahoo! Answers