best baby monitor usa image
abcd
In the USA, if you come and you're illegal and you have your kid in the USA, he/she is a citizen here for life. Why did the USA ever allow this in the first place? It sounds backward, doesn't it? Who ever allowed this birthrights craziness in the first place?
If this birthright thing is in the Constitution, then why don't we enact an AMENDMENT? Something like a LEGAL IMMIGRANT amendment? Wouldn't that seem logical?
Answer
It was a misinterpretation/misapplication by the supreme court of the 14th amendment many years ago. And once there is precedent, you can't go back. The only answer is to repeal the 14th amendment.
The writers of the 14th amendment intended to give citizenship to former slaves, and descendants of former slaves. Not to children of criminals. They would be appalled if they knew what their amendment was being used for. Apparently we fought the civil war, and reconstruction, and passed a lot of laws to put the south in its place, and we continue to monitor the south (they can't do their own redistricting for example) so that we could be invaded by illegals plopping out anchor babies today.
It was a misinterpretation/misapplication by the supreme court of the 14th amendment many years ago. And once there is precedent, you can't go back. The only answer is to repeal the 14th amendment.
The writers of the 14th amendment intended to give citizenship to former slaves, and descendants of former slaves. Not to children of criminals. They would be appalled if they knew what their amendment was being used for. Apparently we fought the civil war, and reconstruction, and passed a lot of laws to put the south in its place, and we continue to monitor the south (they can't do their own redistricting for example) so that we could be invaded by illegals plopping out anchor babies today.
What do men and society as a whole have against vasectomy as means of birth control?
Don S
It seems like society has placed complete burden of birth control mostly on women. Women have a much more complex "plumbing" system than men and they (women) are always left holding the bag as the result of sex. The existing birth control practices and medical devices used by women are not only expensive, requires monitoring and attention, often have side effects, controversial and sometimes dangerous. A slight disregard and it ends up on unwanted pregnancies and possibility of abortions. On the other hand improper and/or careless use of condoms often result in unwanted pregnancies. So why don't men take the responsibility of practicing birth control. Other than the perceived insult to manhood or machoism, it is simple, safe and inexpensive and readily reversible. I shoot "blanks" myself. I had my vasectomy and guess what? My voice did not change and I never found men cute. Sex was better and my partners were much less anxious and romantically at ease. BTW, once a couple decide to have children, vasectomy can easily be reversed or one may take advantage of a sperm bank. One drawback to this concept is that it will result in drastically less business for the medical and pharmaceutical industries.
Answer
Nothing! You only perceive that as a whole men are against vasectomies because those who are against vasectomies make noise about it. Men who are willing to get a vasectomy usually have no agenda and really have no need to make it known that the had or will have a vasectomy.
In the USA about 50% of men, in general, get a vasectomy by the age of 40. In countries like Germany, Japan, and the UK the numbers are higher.
Why? A vasectomy costs about half the price of one monthly child support installment. Also birth control pills are dangerous to the health of women.
Men who are low income very seldom seek a vasectomy. To them it is like losing their "manhood". Men who are professional almost always seek a vasectomy to protect their assets from paternity suits.
Watch any of the documentaries on the subject available on YouTube and see for yourself.
Btw: a reversal is seldom successful. There is no legal definition for a success when it come to vasectomy reversal. When the doctor says 95%, success rate it does not mean 95% of his clients made babies.
Nothing! You only perceive that as a whole men are against vasectomies because those who are against vasectomies make noise about it. Men who are willing to get a vasectomy usually have no agenda and really have no need to make it known that the had or will have a vasectomy.
In the USA about 50% of men, in general, get a vasectomy by the age of 40. In countries like Germany, Japan, and the UK the numbers are higher.
Why? A vasectomy costs about half the price of one monthly child support installment. Also birth control pills are dangerous to the health of women.
Men who are low income very seldom seek a vasectomy. To them it is like losing their "manhood". Men who are professional almost always seek a vasectomy to protect their assets from paternity suits.
Watch any of the documentaries on the subject available on YouTube and see for yourself.
Btw: a reversal is seldom successful. There is no legal definition for a success when it come to vasectomy reversal. When the doctor says 95%, success rate it does not mean 95% of his clients made babies.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: Why did the United States allow illegal birthrights in the first place?
Rating: 96% based on 987 ratings. 4,3 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 96% based on 987 ratings. 4,3 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment